CPC VS Triclosan Efficacy and performance.
Triclosan works for toothpaste, but not for rinsing products, and studies have shown it is not significantly better than soap alone.
In terms of concentration, CPC has a stronger mode of action than triclosan.
CPC: Barrier damage.
Triclosan: Inhibition of fatty acid synthesis.
CPC is better at inhibiting common (based on minimum inhibitory concentrations), it has a broad spectrum of efficacy (for example, fungi) and is less likely to develop drug resistance.
Triclosan is highly effective against E. coli, but many studies have shown that E. coli resistance to triclosan is rooted in its mode of action. Triclosan targets bacteria, but studies have shown they are resistant to it. Triclosan is more bacteriostatic than bactericidal.
CPC VS Triclosan Triclosan has always had safety concerns.
The triclosan products, their safety needs further investigation.
Wal-mart is asking suppliers to remove formaldehyde, triclosan and six other chemicals from its products.
CPC has a proven track record of safe use by many consumers for over 40 years.
CPC in the recommended FDA oral Care monograph.
The US FDA has approved CPC in combination with propylene glycol as a secondary direct food additive.
The Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare has approved CPC as a cosmetic preservative.
SCCS final summary: CPC should be used in mouthwash, lotion and skin care at appropriate concentrations Creams, antiperspirants and deodorants are safe.
CPC to Triclosan - environmental safety.
Environment - Growing concerns about the composition of water cosmetics:
Triclosan has been shown to be ecotoxic, especially to aquatic rings, Algae in the Environment.
Triclosan has been shown to interfere with nitrogen cycling processes in natural systems.
Suzhou Springchem International Co., Ltd. has been specializing in the research and development and production of daily chemical fungicides and other fine chemicals since 1990s. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask!
Post time: Sep-17-2021